Hang on while we load the rest of the page...
 
 

(Possible) Death of the Ding-Dong, Twinkie, Wonder Bread: End of an Era?

Reports are that Hostess is starting to close down after a labor dispute. End of a beloved era, or good riddance to junk food heaven?

 

 

Twinkies. Hostess Cupcakes. Wonder Bread. Ding-dongs.

They could be gone forever, with reports that Hostess Brands, Inc., said today that it will sell off or close down its 82-year old business. Done in, says the CEO, by labor union action.

Hostess filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in January.

The company has been challenged by not only by snarly labor relations, and a national strike by its second-largest labor union, but also, posits the Wall Street Journal, by consumers switching to healthier foods and high ingredient costs. 

But the Journal says that Hostess has threatened liquidation before, and not followed through. 

But if it does liquidate, what do you think about this end to a junk-food kingdom? Will you buy some Ding-dongs and Twinkies just for old times' sake? Stock up on them for the future? Watch the beginning of the move 'Wall-E' for the Twinkie-and-cockroach scene one more time? Is it the end of a beloved era? Or is it 'good riddance,' that the world would be better off without so much junk food? Or do you think someone else will buy them up, and we'll have an unending supply of Twinkies? Tell us what you think in the comments section below.

Related Topics: Hostess Brands, Inc., Twinkies, and Wonder Bread

Jonathan

10:00 am on Friday, November 16, 2012

I'm not panicked yet -- but I really would hate to see these go. I realize they're not healthy, and I'm not advocating eating them often, but an occasional indulgence does not metabolic syndrome make.

There's a restaurant I used to love going to that would deep-fry a Twinkie then serve it with ice cream. They tried to make it elegant by calling it a beignet... it wasn't... it was just a deep-fried Twinkie covered in ice cream. And it was wonderful.

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Karla Vallance

10:38 am on Friday, November 16, 2012

@ Jonathan, I must admit, I had never even conceived of a deep-fried Twinkie until a trip through Tennessee a couple of years ago. I didn't actually try it, but just seeing it was a sight to behold! And I'm with you on occasional indulgence; in fact, I think there is a business to be made in just selling intensely junky, old-fashioned foods: movie candy (Jujyfruits, Sno-Caps, Milk Duds, etc.) plus Hostess Classics (Twinkie, Ding-dong, etc.) Maybe also offer whoopie pies. Am I right?

Reply

Reader99

11:10 am on Friday, November 16, 2012

I really don't want to see the demise of Hostess Cupcakes, Ding Dongs, or their bread. I hope it doesn't happen.

Reply

Carol Vachon

1:06 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

When I was a kid, my mom would let me have one twinkie or devil dog each day, sometimes two. I spent a lot of time playing outside and was always very thin, so in my experience twinkles don't create the weight problem, but inactivity (or perhaps high fructose corn syrup) does. I'd like to see someone selling twinkles with their 1960s formula- truly delicious.

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Karla Vallance

1:10 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

So @ Carol, the Twinkie formula changed over time?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Carol Vachon

2:07 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

I think that both the texture of the cake and cream changed over time. The cake also developed an artificial flavoring scent and taste, perhaps created by artificial lemon flavoring. The cream also changed and became almost greasy, perhaps created by a change to the fat used in the manufacturing process.

joanne

1:36 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

Deep fried Twinkies- It's a good thing!

Reply

M C Stringfellow

1:58 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

Quick buy Twinkies. They will last through to Armageddon. Maybe we can take them with us to the hereafter. Only kidding. It is a sorry state of affairs when a company cannot survive because of union demands and has no choice but to close. To all union members connected with Hostess. Is this what you want? Speak up, it's your job on the line. Surely, your reps can compromise just a big part. 18,500 + jobs going to unemployment, food stamps, welfare, medicaid, maybe even lost pensions, Looks like Obama is working hard after all.

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Karla Vallance

2:18 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

@ Carol: I think you're right. There is some more interesting reading out there: http://science.howstuffworks.com/innovation/edible-innovations/twinkie.htm

Reply

former business owner

4:09 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

Ditto to MC; Unions are no longer necessary. Public opinion will keep unsafe work places in check, abuse of child labor in check, abuse of labor in check. These are the reasons labor unions were needed; internet ie what you see here, is why it's time for them to go, and for the American public to become accountable for their own actions, ie be good employees so you have the pick of jobs.

Reply

pmotw

4:34 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

Please explain why it had to be sold to venture capitalists? Was it because the previous owner could no longer afford to make the company profitable while meeting union demands? I feel really bad for the workers who were willing to cooperate.

Reply

DAD

5:44 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

The company has been in bankruptcy 3 times . How good could it be?

Reply

Iron Mike

5:47 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

Nearly half my life ago, before Massachusetts, – I dealt with the BC&T in Greenwich, CT – their now-VP Thibodeau was their New England head goon back then.

The union was quite willing to put our bakery out of business, except most of our hourly folks had such minimal transferable skills or English abilities that in the end reason prevailed. I did have a bullet-proof guard shack built after union goons killed a guard at the Stanley Works.

I’ve got a hunch that Thibodeau was expecting Obama to come flying in with a ‘Twinkies are too big to fail bailout‘. Bubba would have, he loved Twinkies. O might have been tempted, but Menu-Mistress Michelle would have stopped him cold; – her personal war on Twinkies.

Union suicide. 18,000+ laid off, – 300+ here in Mass. Now they’ll be on 99 weeks of unemployment – and be an issue in the 2014 mid-terms.

You think for a moment that Thibodeau will feel a salary cut, - or a pang of remorse?

Reply

Me

6:05 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

You realize though, that if Obama saved the Twinkie, it would go against everything Michelle has been preaching about. ;-)

Reply

Iron Mike

6:22 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

TO: Steven Cavaretta

You thought I am nuts? After some of your writings? Jeez!

Obama might save the Twinkie - if all their bakeries had windmills and solar panels...

I've dealt with the BC&T in Georgia and CT - they don't seem to understand thet the per unit profit margin can be as low as 1/4 cent.... They just pay their dues, listen to their shop stewards, and march out the door on cue. For these 1800 - this was the 'last Goodbye'.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Alice H

11:53 am on Saturday, November 17, 2012

I thought you were moving out of the country if Obama won. What are you still doing here. Oh, wait, I know, still complaining about everyone and everything and blaming it all on some socialist conspiracy!

Gary M

6:24 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

In reality, they bet they can turn these companies around. In this case Ripplewood Equity invested over $170m for control of the company. Two hedge funds bought most of Hostess' debt at a reduced rate - betting on a turnaround.

The ironic part here is that Ripplewood's CEO Tim Collins was tight with Dick Gephardt and his angle was to bring him in to deal with the unions. It worked for a while but then the recession hit.

The union conceded in 2004 but they still were in trouble. They went back to them this year and while the Teamsters were for more reductions, the baker's union went on strike which forced the closure ot the company.

The strange thing here is they basically told the bakers if you strike, we have to shut down the company.. - and they struck anyway..

Everyone lost here. The Equity firm, the hedge funds, and especially the other 11 Hostess unions..

Reply

Phil

6:32 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

Very impressive and effective negotiating strategy by the baker's union. Congratulations!

Reply

Reader99

7:51 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

I don't know what these people make but I doubt it that's much. I don't care for all unions but these folks are probably NOT overpaid.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Iron Mike

8:20 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

I've worked in two bakeries where the BC&T represented the hourly workers. They are paid a fair wage – even a competitive wage. Somewhere between many and most come with minimal education, language and job skills. They are trained on a particular task or a particular machine. It's safer and cleaner than construction work.

Often multiple family members / multiple generations are employed. The best get promotions into supervisory ranks.

Come Christmas – ask any of them you know if they think their union pushed too hard.

If you've just worked 15 years in a wrapping department - and caused your business to die by strike - you won't find other employers very excited about hiring you. Their bluff failed...

Holden

8:19 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

Lots of companies closing since Nov 6th it seems.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Iron Mike

8:29 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

You can check the daily total here: http://www.dailyjobcuts.com/

November 7th ~ was ~ to have been the day companies started hiring, - but the election went to the socialists... Too bad for America. It's gonna be a rough 4 years!

Comment_arrow

M C Stringfellow

11:15 am on Saturday, November 17, 2012

Those companies that are closing or have closed, were just waiting for the election to be over. The layoffs the same. One way, they might survive. the other way , the cost would bankrupt the small business owner. I guess the other way won. Everyone talks about tax hikes (and if you think the middle class won't be hit by tax hikes, you are crazy). Instead of hiking taxes, cut out all unnecessary spending. Like jet fuel for Air Force One (stop all unnecessary trips). Programs like Shrimps on a treadmill. CETA, I think thats correct spelling) biggest boondoggle if there ever was one. Lots of ways to cut spending, including a freeze on Congressional pay raises or even a cut in pay as they are hardly in seat anyway. Get rid of the CZARS. Valerie Jarrett can do the job. She seems to run the WH anyway, or at least carries significant weight in decision making. Then and only then look at raising taxes. Might not have to or they will not go up as much.

Hieronymous Cock

8:04 am on Saturday, November 17, 2012

Steven,

The term is 'venture', not 'vulture'. These firms have saved many a company, but not one with a suicidal union.

Reply

Hieronymous Cock

9:38 am on Saturday, November 17, 2012

Steven,

Let us know if you would like to try a job in the private sector. We can help you rehearse, "Would you like fries with that?"

Reply

Iron Mike

10:45 am on Saturday, November 17, 2012

Well Steven, Hieronymus may have misunderstood you once,...or twice,...

But over time there is a certain tone to your writings,...you do a pretty good job of parroting White House talking points. So he could easily have mistaken you as one of Obama's campaign workers... Just say'n...
- - -
As for Capitalism, - it works to give us all a better life because good ideas become good products which the marketplace will support.

By contrast, in Russia the state determined what should be made, what goods would be stocked in stores, and how much each person would be paid – whether they worked hard or not... In the end the entire country collapsed.

Hostess may emerge one day from bankruptcy – maybe open new bakeries in right-to-work states, and you ~ might ~ get to enjoy a Twinkie again with your Kool-Aid.

Meanwhile, with unemployment about to skyrocket, - unions would be well advised to pull in their horns.

Reply

Deb

9:01 pm on Saturday, November 17, 2012

This is just Union busting. The company tried to get the workers to take pay cuts, health benefit cuts and pension cuts. So the workers said no and went on strike, management (who were not long time owners, they were Mitt Romney types who don't want to run businesses, they want to make profits) fired them, they will take all the cash out of the pension fund, and sell the brand, probably to Lance or Nabisco or Keebler, and run to the Cayman Islands. This has been coming for two years and I have been following the story. No more apple pies for me!

Reply

Stephen J. Tripi Sr

9:20 pm on Saturday, November 17, 2012

Best definition of a labor union and it is mine - MORE AND MORE PAY FOR LESS AND LESS AND LESS WORK. So much for creating jobs!!

Reply

Hieronymous Cock

2:20 am on Sunday, November 18, 2012

Poor Deb believes a company can continue to take many millions of losses rather than bring union compensation in line with current standards. Only her government can do that.

Reply

Mike Hullinger

7:00 am on Sunday, November 18, 2012

Steve Carvetta, You have no idea how venture funds invest in turnaround situations. These investors play the role of patient capital in distressed and overleveraged situations, and make their money on a successful exit only if the restructring process is a success. I've done it, saving many, many jobs in the process, including, by the way, a bakery in the metropolitan New York area, that did not have a union shop, and the workers didn't want a union shop because they were paid fairly with decent benefits. We rescued this company after its expansion plans failed miserably and the bank was in foreclosure mode. This happened a decade ago and the company is alive and well today.

Reply

Hieronymous Cock

8:19 am on Sunday, November 18, 2012

Mike, The last U.S. election shows how potent government and political propaganda can be. Your vocation of venture capital was formerly honorable, but now has been demonized. As illustrated by the responses of gullible writers here, the re-education of the masses in your country has been complete. Thanks to Obama, if you work hard, put your money at risk, and succeed, your reward will be insult and higher taxes. Say hello to Greece.

Reply

Iron Mike

9:35 am on Sunday, November 18, 2012

Wow, how ugly things have gotten here in the USSA – where Steven sees only evil in American capitalism, - and only good in government programs and unions.

After his several outbursts I can only believe he is ready to re-write our Constitution and eliminate those pesky Amendments..., except maybe ones guaranteeing free abortions and free drugs...

I wonder if he wants doctors unionized...?

I'm sure his concept of 'fairness' in business included a 6-figure paycheck for union janitors pushing brooms around a Twinkie plant, so long as they can qualify for early retirement.

We know what happened in Europe when they ran out of other peoples' money, and there were no 'billionaires and millionaires' left around to tax. I wonder what Steven foresees in his old age? Maybe that 100-pill deal? Maybe THATS his concept of personal responsibility?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bronze Joe

1:24 pm on Sunday, November 18, 2012

You can insult socialism and liberals all you want but Social Security and Medicare are both considered "socialist" programs enacted by the liberal presidents like FDR and Johnson. Don't seeing you complaining much about him. If we just cut both of those programs entirely, we would no longer be in debt (or you're just a grumpy old hypocrite who doesn't want S.S. or Medicare cut). Obama has hardly changed America. Nothing's been passed and we're not all of a sudden some socialist welfare state (parts of welfare have been cut).

You're real "patriotic", huh. I've heard of you before Iron Mike. You're just a grumpy, uneducated fat veteran that never went to college (unless the federal "big-govt" GI Bill saved your ass). You have no experience in politics or economics at all and you're opinions don't mean anything. Obama's your American president. Deal with it.

Comment_arrow

Bronze Joe

1:40 pm on Sunday, November 18, 2012

Steven - never said I liked Warren. I actually hate both her and brown.

MiriamSt87

1:15 pm on Sunday, November 18, 2012

So sad to have all the Fox News fans here being interrupted by reality....The election results confirm that most "real Americans" (not just the 1% crowd cheering on Thurston Howell Romney and his wife Lovey) are giving this President 4 more years to clean up the complete mess George W left with us---which you Iron Mike and your cronies supported---Two wars paid for with five tax cuts which resulted in the worst recession in 70 years---You are and were wrong---Now, get out of the way and let us clean this up.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bronze Joe

1:28 pm on Sunday, November 18, 2012

Too true! At least some of these guys are old and will die soon enough!

Comment_arrow

M C Stringfellow

1:37 pm on Sunday, November 18, 2012

I'm sorry too. That he has to clean up his own mess. In reality, every president since 1956 thru 1993 has had to clean up the mess left by the Democartic controlled congress. IN some cases, it was President, House and Senate Democrats who controlled the mess. Since then, it has been hit or miss in making ends meet. So, get your facts straight and stop blaming Bush. Obama is not blameless in this mess. I do not include Clinton and Bush. Clinton left us with a balanced budget (Obama has not even left us with a budget, never mind balanced. Bush's 8 years were marred by 9/11. if that had not happened, it could have been a different administration. Everything is compromise and Obama is not a compromiser. Promising to veto any bill that comes across his desk that did not include what he wanted, everything he wanted. His job is to propose a budget. Congress's job is to approve. Only Congress can tax, spend, and approved budgets. President can only propose. Read the Constitution Article 1 and Article 2 and Article 3. These are the powers that each branch has, no more no less. You really do not like people to be successful and become wealthy. Maybe you should consider moving to a socialist country or communist country where the first thing you will lose is freedom of speech and the second is the right to bear arms.

Comment_arrow

M C Stringfellow

3:12 pm on Monday, December 10, 2012

I would not let you clean my kitty litter. I am a REAL AMERICAN and I am not in the 1% crowd. Everything I have I worked for. NO hand outs. Occasionally, unemployment checks. Just because a person votes for a candidate, does not mean that they support him in every decision. I did not think we should be in those conflicts(not wars, never declared by congress). I suppose you feel that Vietnam was the Republicans fault also. Some of that mess was from Clinton, Bush 1, Reagan, CARTER, Ford and Nixon,Johnson and , yes, Kennedy. It's all a trickle up. And believe it or not, Your parents, my parents and everyone parents are just a guilty for the state of the union. We let it happen, because we did not want to be bothered by the little things such as spending of tax dollars. As long as the public got theirs, they did not care how it was managed. So stop blaming a party or a president and take some responsibility other than name calling. SIgned A life long Republican American

Iron Mike

1:33 pm on Sunday, November 18, 2012

Behold – the inclusive, tolerant, respectful and humble European-Amerikan Socialists. Now you begin to understand how Hitler was so able to fool the masses.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bronze Joe

1:38 pm on Sunday, November 18, 2012

You're not one to talk about being inclusive and tolerant

M C Stringfellow

1:38 pm on Sunday, November 18, 2012

You got that right, Iron Mike. History has always repeated itself and we are on the way down that slippery slope.

Reply

Iron Mike

1:50 pm on Sunday, November 18, 2012

To: 'Bronze Joe'

Actually Joe, we Conservatives and Republicans would like you lefties to wake up, see the light, do the math, and see how History is repeating itself to destroy the best country ever to flurish on the face of the earth.

It's you 'tolerant' types who are always telling us to shut up, move away, or die.

So which group is the open-minded one?

Will Social Security and Medicare be solvent when you reach your 70th birthday? Are you aware how long the average working man lived when Social Security was enacted in 1935?

Do you understand that it was always a Ponzi Scheme? Why is the Demokratic party so set on not touching it; - is it ~ possibly ~ because it serves as their great voter plantation, along with unemployment, food stamps, and student loans?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bronze Joe

2:30 pm on Sunday, November 18, 2012

And you tell us to shut up and die, calling us names and insults. How "tolerant." I think a lot of math was needed on Ryan and Romney's economic plans. And yes, Social Security has some problems, but they are not urgent and it still is true that Social Security is a SOCIALIST program! Like medicare!

Comment_arrow

Bronze Joe

2:30 pm on Sunday, November 18, 2012

In a true capitalist society, no such thing as regulation or social security would exist.

Gary M

2:13 pm on Sunday, November 18, 2012

Miriam and Steve seem to think that all 1% 'ers are Republican and 99% are all Demoratic. It's simple and easy to fit these things into a nice little box.

To get back to Hostess the "vulture capitalist" here is Tim Collins CEO of Ripplewood. He's a..... Democrat. Dick Gephardt's son who sat on the board is also a..... Democrat.

In fact most 1%'ers are independent. 41 percent identify themselves as independents, while 33 percent say they are Republicans and 26 percent are Democrats. The 99 percent of the population is also mostly independents, consisting of 39 percent of independents, 28 percent of Republicans and 33 percent of Democrats.

Hardly a huge majority one way or the other.

Regarding the uber rich, 16 out the Forbes 20 richest in the U.S. are Democrats...

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1211/69776.html#ixzz2CbRjLZX4

Reply

Iron Mike

4:58 pm on Sunday, November 18, 2012

>> they run good companies into the ground

Steven, what is the Democrat Party's definition of 'a good company' vs 'a bad company'.

Does it have anything to do with being unionized? Are there any 'good companies' that are non-union, and being run by venture capitalists?

In their day, were Wang, Prime, DEC, Data General, Symbolics, Studebaker, or Grumman Aircraft 'good companies'? How about the Fore River Shipyard?

Reply

Gary M

6:51 pm on Sunday, November 18, 2012

Ripplewood, The private equity firm here, is basically losing everything they invested - just like they did when they bet on Reader's Digest.

Private Equity's and Hedge Funds both make more money if a company they invest in turns around. Assets and Branding bring in much less than a profitable company or when that be sold as a viable entity to another investor.

Keep in mind, too, that some of the biggest investors in PE's and Hedge Funds are pensions, endowments, etc... Harvard increased it's endowment by 21% in 2011 largely due to the strong returns from it's Hedge Fund Portfolio.

Reply

Hieronymous Cock

9:51 pm on Sunday, November 18, 2012

Steven, We can't do much to help you. We hope things work out okay. You do live in one of the better states, in terms of public assistance.

Reply

Iron Mike

10:12 pm on Sunday, November 18, 2012

Just curious Steven,...and you don't have to give a specific answer,...but did you lose your 'dream job' and your life savings to some 'evil venture capitalist'?

Have uncaring Republican businessmen pulled the rug out from under you – leaving you to live out your days in a run-down trailer park?

Or, are you actually employed as a union business agent?

Reply

Ron Parkinson

8:29 am on Monday, December 10, 2012

The focus of the management was to break the unions at Hostess and to break up the company and sell off the brands. It is a no brainer that the brands are worth more than an outdated organization whose best food was Wonder Bread that was like a Twinky without the filling.

Blaming the unions for years of bad management of the company is typical. The checks and balances of our economy were unions, management and shareholders and the press to spotlight poor behavior. The term in business school was "satisficing". Now jobs can be shipped overseas, plants closed , and work "outsourced" to produce inferior products. Any business manager who can't work with unions isn't a very good manager. I have been in management of union companies and never had a strike or paid wages higher than non union competitors on a percent of sales basis. If you lie to unions they will never trust you again and once the relationship goes bad it is very hard to save. Bad relations with unions usually started with management.

Hostess will die because the company never changed with the times. The fastest growing grocery store in the country is Whole Foods. You will never see a hostess truck in their parking lot. This is a classic management failure and a typical private equity splitup because the brands are the only value left and it will all be blamed on the unions. It makes an easy but untrue headline.

Reply

Ron Parkinson

9:16 am on Monday, December 10, 2012

Steven, Hostess would be more of a private equity play than a venture play. This was always about a breakup while venture capital focuses on building new organizations. Some firms really get involved in both. They are both focused on their own profits but I have always found venture to be aligned with management when things are making progress. VC's recognize failure before management and not continue to fund.

You outsource Twinkies to contract manufacturing in the US not overseas. It breaks unions and moving the manufacturing to the lowest bidder continues to cut cost and quality until no customer who would eat such a bad product is left.

Reply

Steven Cavaretta

9:33 am on Monday, December 10, 2012

No matter what you call them there vultures using other peoples money to rip companies apart and sell the pieces. And where the hell do you find a contract bakery theyll use the same old oven with scab labor and pay themslves bonuses for it.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dennis O'Donnell

10:37 am on Monday, December 10, 2012

Steven, Not picking a side here, but in nature, real vultures and other decomposers like bacteria, and fungi, are part of a healthy ecosystem. In a capitalist society, like ours, private equity, along with public equity, private debt, and public debt, is also a necessary component of a healthy economy. Private equity will take risks that other entities wouldn't and thus require a higher payback for taking that risk. And, not all private equity shops break up conglomerates for the pieces. There are many different strategies within private equity. Also, when using the other people's money, these others want the higher returns as well to balance out the lower risk lower reward aspects of a given portfolio.

Comment_arrow

Iron Mike

10:57 am on Monday, December 10, 2012

Since you obviously loathe Venture Capitalists Steven, - what is YOUR solution about what to do with dying and mismanaged companies, - or companies where union demands have exceed reality?

EXACTLY what would YOU have done to save Hostess?

HOW MUCH of a RAISE would you have given the union?

Comment_arrow

Steven Cavaretta

3:21 pm on Monday, December 10, 2012

Dang mike you sure get around. Your a war expert and a business genius to. Well for starters i wouldn't pay bonuses to vultures who know nothing about a business except how to load it up with debt. Thats kinda like hazardous duty pay for a guy who sits behind a desk while kids do his fighting for him.

Dennis O'Donnell

2:20 pm on Monday, December 10, 2012

Don't villify them without better understanding them...or the broader economy in general. One of the base assumptions underlying all economics is that people will rationally chose self-interest, e.g. the accumulation of wealth. This is the manner they have chosen because it offers tremendous rewards for tremendous risk (financially speaking). And for pensioners, life insurance companies, unions, foundations, endowments, etc, they're an essential part of the economy. And no, they don't always get their 20 (but they typically get their 2...or 1.5 or whatever fee structure they have set up. But also know that a lot of them put their own money at risk and into their GP so their risks are better aligned with their LPs.

And to reiterate and clarify, venture capitalists are a subset of private equity that mainly focus on new companies whereas traditional private equity firms get involved with companies at many stages of their lifecycles. I find it a shame that the US is the world's largest economy but economics and finance aren't usually taught until college (if at all!). I think those subjects should be integrated into curricula so that the social costs of capitalism can be discussed on a more even footing of understanding.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Steven Cavaretta

2:27 pm on Monday, December 10, 2012

I understand bottom feeders who get there 2 and 20 when they make money and lose nothing when they dont. Big reward for big risk with other peoples money and when they screw up they wont let you take your money back for years all the while get there fees. Yep they chose self interest.

Patch_comments_icon

Karla Vallance

3:52 pm on Monday, December 10, 2012

Sorry, Dennis, we don't allow any profanity or ersatz profanity. You're welconme to re-post your comment with clean language. Thanks.

Reply

Dennis O'Donnell

3:57 pm on Monday, December 10, 2012

If you understand all this, then what's your issue with them? There are much worse things going on in the world and far worse people. Do you know any people in PE? They're generally like everyone else. There are some great people; there are some "not-so-nice" people; and a whole lot in the middle.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Steven Cavaretta

4:09 pm on Monday, December 10, 2012

My issue is that they destroy companies lives and towns to make a buck then they say its carried interest pay no taxes all the while screaming about the 47%. Your in pe sorry if the truth hurts.

Dennis O'Donnell

5:39 pm on Monday, December 10, 2012

You should direct your ire at the management that drove these companies into the ground in the first place. They destroyed the companies and the lives and the towns. The PE firm didn't put them in that position. Plus, they're not breaking any laws by paying the legal tax rates for carried interest. Who wants to pay higher taxes? Especially when the government is pretty inefficient at spending it wisely. No one. But, yes, the 47% comment was insensitive and unfortunate. It is also irrelevant to this discussion because that was Mitt Romney, candidate, speaking to donors (not all of whom are private equity). It was not the Private Equity industry and part of their strategy (which is what I thought we were discussing).

I'm just trying to clarify the realities of what PE is and what it isn't. The truth never hurts.

Reply

Reverend E. Raleigh Pimperton III

6:11 pm on Monday, December 10, 2012

In Michigan, brave Governor Snyder and courageous Republican legislators take on the union hackerama and now... The Chosen One. Let us hope Michigan becomes a right-to-work state.

Reverend E. Raleigh Pimperton III

Reply

Leave a comment

 
 
 
 

Your town. Mobilized.

Download Patch for iPhone or Patch Places for Android.

Learn more 

Own a local business?

Stay in touch with customers by claiming your free Patch listing.

Learn more 

Advertise on Patch

Build community trust in your local brand with game-changing tools for any budget.

Learn how